Any paper submitted to the Central European Review of Economics & Finance should not be under consideration for publication at another journal. All submitted papers must also represent original work, and should fully reference and describe all prior work on the same subject and compare the submitted paper to that work..
Authors should also indicate, either in their cover letter or in the title page referred to below or both, whether the research reported in their paper was the result of a for-pay consulting relationship or if they or their employer has a financial interest in the topic of the paper which might constitute a conflict of interest.
Source information for tables, figures, maps, photos, and other artwork should be mentioned in the captions. For material that is copyrighted, you must obtain a letter of permission from the copyright holder.
Publication of an extended abstract or a full version in a computer science conference volume will not preclude publication of a full version in the Central European Review of Economics & Finance.
All articles are reviewed.
It is understood that submission of the paper for publication has been approved by all of the authors and by the institutions where the work was carried out; further, that any person cited as a source of personal communications has approved such citation. Written authorization may be required at the editor's discretion. Articles and any other materials published in the Central European Review of Economics & Finance represent the opinions of the author(s) and should not be construed to reflect the opinion of the Editorial Board, Scientific Committee or the Publisher.
Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if the manuscript is accepted for publication, copyright in the article, including the right to reproduce the article in all forms and media, shall be assigned exclusively to the Publisher.
No royalty for authors is paid.
The explanation of ghostwriting
Reliability of science is one of its qualitative foundations. Readers should be guaranteed that authors of publications present the results of their work in a clear, reliable and honest manner regardless of the fact whether they are the direct authors of publication or they took benefit of specialized help (natural or legal person).
Openness of information on any party contributing to preparation of a publication (content-related, material, financial, etc. input) is proof of ethical attitude of a research worker and of high editorial standards and that is an indication of both good practice and social responsibility.
“Ghostwriting” and “guest authorship” are contradictory examples. “Ghostwriting” is a situation where a person contributes significantly to a publication and is not disclosed as one of the authors or named in the acknowledgments.
“Guest authorship” (“honorary authorship”) is a situation where an author's contribution is insignificant or non existent and he is still listed as author/co-author of a publication.
To prevent cases of “ghostwriting” and “guest authorship” editorial office of Central European Review of Economics & Finance implemented adequate procedures specific to discipline represented or implement the procedure specified below:
1. The editorial office requires authors to disclose contribution of individual authors to preparation of a publication (with a list of their affiliations) in detail, i.e. provide information on who is the author of concept, premises, methods, protocol etc. used in the publication. Main responsibility to disclose full information remains on author submitting manuscript.
2. The editorial office explains in the “Instructions for authors” that “ghostwriting” and “guest authorship” are indication of scientific dishonesty and all cases will be exposed and adequate institutions will be informed (employers, scientific societies, scientific editors associations, etc.)
3. The editorial office acquires information on sources of financing of a publication, financial contributions of research institutions, scientific associations and other (“financial disclosure”).
4. The editorial office documents all indications of scientific dishonesty especially of violation of ethical principals followed in science.